search_search_devices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description mentions 'fuzzy search' implying partial matching, but lacks details on idempotency, side effects, or auth requirements. No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden but only gives minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is highly concise and front-loads the key purpose. However, slightly too brief given the lack of parameter and usage details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Describes what is searched but omits output behavior (output schema exists but not referenced) and pagination context. With sibling search tools, more guidance would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not explain the parameters (query, limit) or how the searchable fields map to them. The description lists searchable fields but does not clarify how to structure the query or limit results.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool performs fuzzy search across specific device attributes: name, name_by_user, manufacturer, and model. Differentiates from sibling search tools like search_search_areas and search_search_entities by targeting devices.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., search_find_related, search_deep_search). Does not mention when not to use it or specify prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.