automations_set_script_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description adds one behavioral trait ('Auto-reloads scripts') but omits other important aspects like overwrite behavior, validation, or authorization requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words: first states purpose, second notes auto-reload side effect. Conciseness is excellent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a creation/overwrite tool with output schema present, description covers purpose and side effect. Missing details on error handling or return value, but schema compensates. Adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 0% description coverage. The description compensates by explaining config is a 'script YAML config (sequence, fields, ...)', adding semantic meaning beyond the schema's generic 'object' type.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'create or overwrite a script YAML config' with specific detail (sequence, fields, ...), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_script_config or run_script.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for setting script config but gives no explicit when-to-use vs alternatives or prerequisites. Sibling context suggests differentiation but description lacks guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.