Skip to main content
Glama

entities_assign_entity_to_area

Assign a Home Assistant entity to a specific area to organize devices by location within your smart home.

Instructions

Assign an entity to an area.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
entity_idYes
area_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The MCP tool handler for 'assign_entity_to_area'. It takes an entity_id and area_id, and delegates to ha.update_entity_registry with area_id=area_id.
    @mcp.tool()
    def assign_entity_to_area(entity_id: str, area_id: str) -> dict:
        """Assign an entity to an area."""
        return ha.update_entity_registry(entity_id, area_id=area_id)
  • The function signature defines the input parameters (entity_id: str, area_id: str) and return type (dict). No explicit Pydantic schema; FastMCP infers from type hints.
    def assign_entity_to_area(entity_id: str, area_id: str) -> dict:
        """Assign an entity to an area."""
        return ha.update_entity_registry(entity_id, area_id=area_id)
  • The @mcp.tool() decorator registers the function as an MCP tool named 'assign_entity_to_area' (derived from the function name).
    @mcp.tool()
  • The helper function update_entity_registry that sends a WebSocket call to 'config/entity_registry/update' with the entity_id and kwargs (including area_id).
    def update_entity_registry(entity_id: str, **kwargs) -> dict:
        return _ws_call("config/entity_registry/update", entity_id=entity_id, **kwargs)
  • The _ws_call helper that bridges async WebSocket calls to synchronous context, used by update_entity_registry.
    def _ws_call(msg_type: str, **kwargs) -> Any:
        try:
            asyncio.get_running_loop()
        except RuntimeError:
            return asyncio.run(_ws_call_async(msg_type, **kwargs))
        import concurrent.futures
        with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as pool:
            return pool.submit(asyncio.run, _ws_call_async(msg_type, **kwargs)).result()
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It provides no information about idempotency, side effects, or what happens if the entity is already assigned to an area.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is efficient and front-loaded. It is not overly verbose, but the brevity comes at the cost of missing crucial details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not mention what the tool returns or any side effects. For a mutation tool, more context is needed to understand the full effect of the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% parameter description coverage, and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter names. The parameters 'entity_id' and 'area_id' are self-explanatory but lack context about formats or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool assigns an entity to an area, using a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from similar assignment tools like 'labels_assign_label_to_device', which also assigns something to an entity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as area management or other assignment tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, like needing existing entities and areas, or any context about ideal scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Fistacho/ha-nexus-agent'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server