entities_turn_off
Turn off any Home Assistant entity by providing its entity ID.
Instructions
Turn off an entity.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Turn off any Home Assistant entity by providing its entity ID.
Turn off an entity.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits (e.g., what turning off means, if it affects physical devices, reversibility). The single sentence provides none.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (4 words) but this comes at the cost of necessary details. It could be expanded while remaining efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the maturity of the protocol (Home Assistant) and the number of sibling tools, this description is insufficient for an AI agent to use correctly. It lacks any context around when to use it or what the output schema provides.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the entity_id parameter. No format, source, or example is given.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Turn off an entity.' clearly states the verb and resource, and it distinguishes well from siblings like entities_turn_on and entities_toggle.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like entities_disable_entity or entities_toggle. The description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Fistacho/ha-nexus-agent'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server