helpers_set_input_select

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It only states the basic action without disclosing behavioral traits such as whether the entity must be of domain input_select, if the option must be valid, or any side effects like triggering auto-assist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Eight words, directly stating the action and target. No filler words. Ideal conciseness for a simple setter tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a basic setter but missing details like domain validation and relationship to similar tools (e.g., entities_select_option). With an output schema, return values are not required, but the description should clarify scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds minimal meaning: 'entity_id' as the input_select and 'option' as the value to set, but does not specify constraints like valid options or format. Agents must infer from context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Set an input_select to a specific option' clearly states the action (set) and the entity type (input_select). It differentiates from sibling helpers_set_* tools that modify other input types, but does not distinguish from entities_select_option which may have similar functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like entities_select_option. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, preferred use cases, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.