esphome_lvgl_get_page_widgets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavior. It notes that lambda callbacks are shown as '<lambda>' and directs to esphome_get_config for details. However, it doesn't state whether the operation is safe (non-destructive) or require authentication, though the name implies a read.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences: purpose, return summary, and a notable behavioral detail. No redundancy, information density is high.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 2 simple parameters, no annotations, but an output schema exists, the description covers the core functionality and a key behavioral nuance. However, it omits parameter descriptions and usage context, leaving gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters 'device_name' or 'page_id'. It mentions 'a specific page of an ESPHome device' but provides no format or context for the parameter values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves all widgets on a specific page, listing the type of information returned (types, IDs, positions, key properties). It distinguishes from sibling tools like add/delete widget, though not explicitly from other get tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor prerequisites like device connectivity or page existence. The description implies a read operation but lacks situational context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.