card_builder_make_template_card

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description discloses the core action (creates a saved card) and the slot override behavior, but does not mention side effects, permissions, or error states. Acceptable but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero waste. First sentence states the core action and result; second sentence adds critical usage context for the output. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main intent and output usage but omits parameter details for optional fields and does not mention error handling or prerequisites. For a tool with 6 params and an output schema, it is partially complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should explain all parameters. It only describes 'template', 'name', and 'slot' (implicitly), leaving 'description', 'tags', and 'categories' unexplained. Minimal compensation for schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: pick a template, name it, get back a card_id. It distinguishes from siblings like card_builder_create_card by specifying it's a template card creation, but does not explicitly differentiate from other card_builder tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like card_builder_create_card or card_builder_build_from_recipe. The description implies a one-shot creation but does not exclude other use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.