helpers_set_input_number

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states a simple set operation but omits any details about side effects, confirmation, or error states. The brevity leaves the agent unaware of potential constraints or post-invocation behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no redundant words. It is concise and front-loaded, providing the essential verb and target.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although the tool is simple (2 required params), the description lacks any mention of return values (despite an output schema existing) and does not cover edge cases or preconditions. Given the lack of annotations, more complete context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 2 parameters with 0% description coverage, and the description adds no semantic context for either 'entity_id' or 'value'. It does not explain what constitutes a valid entity_id or the expected range/format of the value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Set an input_number value' clearly uses a verb ('Set') and a specific resource ('input_number value'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not differentiate among sibling tools like helpers_set_input_boolean, helpers_set_input_datetime, etc., which all have similar 'Set' patterns.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. It lacks context about the appropriate scenarios for setting an input_number value.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.