helpers_cancel_timer
Cancel a running timer in Home Assistant by providing its entity ID.
Instructions
Cancel a running timer.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Cancel a running timer in Home Assistant by providing its entity ID.
Cancel a running timer.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must carry behavioral info. It only states the action but omits side effects, error states (e.g., if timer not running), or confirmation of cancellation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise at one sentence. However, it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity. Acceptable for a trivial tool, but could be improved with minimal extra context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity and presence of an output schema, the description does not mention what the output represents (success/failure, status). Lacks completeness for an agent to fully understand behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'entity_id' has 0% schema description coverage, and the description adds no explanation of its format, role, or how to obtain it. Agent is left to infer.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Cancel a running timer' uses a specific verb ('cancel') and resource ('running timer'), clearly indicating the action. It differentiates from siblings like helpers_start_timer.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or prerequisites like ensuring a timer is running. The description is purely functional without contextual cues.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Fistacho/ha-nexus-agent'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server