card_builder_delete_style_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description offers no behavioral details. It does not disclose whether deletion is permanent, if it cascades to dependent cards, or any side effects. The description fails to add value beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While short, the description is under-specified. It sacrifices necessary detail for brevity, making it less helpful for an AI agent. A concise but informative description would be preferred.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and many related sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on return values, error conditions, and behavioral context like permanence of deletion.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'style_preset_id' has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description provides no additional meaning. The agent has no guidance on where to obtain the ID or what format it expects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (style preset), with no ambiguity. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create and update style presets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update or list. No context on prerequisites, such as whether the preset must exist or if it can be deleted while in use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.