sportsbet_results_classes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states the output and that it's date-filtered, but doesn't mention side effects (e.g., read-only), auth needs, or what happens with invalid dates. Minimal behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise: one line of description, a return type, and an example. No wasted words. Front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema), description covers the basic purpose and input/output. Missing date format specification, but otherwise complete enough for a simple query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must add meaning. It links the 'date' parameter to the purpose ('for a date'), but does not specify format (e.g., YYYY-MM-DD) or constraints. Adequate but could be improved.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it returns sport classes with results available for a date, using verb 'returns' and resource 'sport classes'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like sportsbet_results_competitions (competitions) and sportsbet_sports_classes (all classes).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No explicit context, prerequisites, or exclusions. The example 'Classes with results today' implies usage but doesn't compare to other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.