mlb_schedule_postseason_tunein

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the return structure (dates with games containing gamePk and broadcasts), which is helpful. However, no annotations are provided, and the description does not address behavioral aspects like idempotency, side effects, or required permissions. It does not contradict any annotations as none exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at two sentences, with the main purpose stated first. The return format is given in a compact pseudo-code style. It is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and undocumented parameters, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on parameter usage, any limitations (e.g., default season handling), and does not specify if the data is up-to-date or historical. The return format description is helpful but insufficient for full contextual understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 2 parameters (season, sportId) with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not explain these parameters at all, leaving the agent to infer their meaning from context or naming. This is a significant gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides 'Postseason broadcast tune-in info' specifying where and when to watch playoff games. It distinguishes from siblings like mlb_schedule_postseason (which likely gives general schedule) by focusing on broadcast details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for postseason broadcast information but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like mlb_schedule_postseason or mlb_schedule. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.