nbl_players

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It describes the output structure and sample data, but does not disclose rate limits, authentication needs, or explicitly state it is a read-only operation, though the content implies safe data retrieval.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is mostly concise and front-loaded with the core purpose, though it includes a detailed return format and example that add some length. It is well-structured but could be slightly more terse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple parameter set and lack of output schema, the description covers the essential return structure and tool linkage. It is lacking parameter format clarification but is otherwise complete for a list-oriented tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions 'one season' and gives an example 'NBL26', but the year parameter is an integer and the format (e.g., 2026 or 2025-2026) is ambiguous. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not clarify expected values, range, or format, leaving uncertainty.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves all players for a season, specifies the fields and embedded objects (player, team, season), and explains how the player ID feeds other tools. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like nbl_player_stats and nbl_player_boxscores.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for getting a season's full player list and hints at downstream tools via the player ID, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or specify any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.