pointsbet_racing_races

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It correctly identifies it as a batch retrieval operation (implicitly read-only) but does not disclose authentication, rate limits, or error handling. For a simple read, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two front-loaded sentences: one for purpose, one for return format. No wasted words, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one parameter and no output schema, the description provides the return structure which is helpful. It lacks details on error cases or limitations, but for a simple batch retrieval, it is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description compensates by stating the return structure. The single parameter 'raceIds' is named clearly, and the purpose implies it expects race IDs. This adds meaningful context beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves racecards for multiple races in one call by batch of race IDs. It uses specific verbs ('batch by race ids') and resources ('racecards'), and distinguishes itself from siblings like pointsbet_racing_race which targets a single race.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when multiple racecards are needed via 'batch by race ids'. It does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives, but the context of batching is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.