pointsbet_sports_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description documents the return structure. However, it does not disclose behavioral specifics like read-only nature, error handling, or behavior for different date values. Partially compensates with return schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise with two clear parts: a summary and a return structure. No unnecessary fluff. Example is useful. Could be slightly more structured but highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Describes return structure, but missing explanation of the required date parameter. For a simple list tool, it is partially complete but the parameter omission is a notable gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and description does not explain the required 'date' parameter. No meaning added beyond the schema's type declaration. Agent cannot understand what value to provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Name and description clearly state it returns the full catalogue of sports with competitions. 'Full catalogue' distinguishes from potentially similar tools like pointsbet_sport_competitions. Return structure and example add clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like pointsbet_sport_competitions or pointsbet_event. No mention of when not to use or prerequisites such as the date parameter's role.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.