mlb_seasons

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It states the return format but does not disclose authorization needs, rate limits, or edge cases. The behavior is implied as a read-only catalogue, but this is not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one line for purpose and a code block for return format. It is front-loaded and contains no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description provides the return structure explicitly. However, it lacks explanation for the season parameter and does not offer context on pagination, rate limits, or differentiation from many sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'Pass sportId=1' but does not explain the 'season' parameter (e.g., that it filters by year). This is incomplete for a 2-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns a season catalogue with key dates and specifies sportId=1 for MLB. It identifies the resource and action but does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like mlb_season or mlb_seasons_all.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only minimal guidance is provided: 'Pass sportId=1.' No explanation of when to use this tool versus alternatives like mlb_season or mlb_seasons_all, nor any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.