mlb_linescore

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description mentions returns for live games but doesn't disclose behavior for completed games, authentication needs, or rate limits. Return structure is partially described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Relatively concise (two sentences), but return structure in description could be inferred and adds some bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 2 parameters, 1 required, and no output schema or annotations, description should explain parameters and provide more behavioral context; only describes outputs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and description adds no meaning to parameters (gamePk, timecode) – only shows return structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Game linescore' and lists specific components (runs per inning, R/H/E totals, inning state, on-base/defense) and distinguishes from sibling tools like mlb_boxscore.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives; implied for live game line scores but no exclusions or comparisons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.