mlb_sports

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read-only lookup returning structured data, but lacks explicit statements about safety, authentication, or rate limits. No annotations exist to supplement this.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two sentences covering purpose, parameter hint, and return format. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description adequately specifies the return fields (id, code, name, abbreviation, sortOrder, activeStatus) and clarifies the sportId lookup behavior. The only gap is not explicitly stating the default behavior when sportId is omitted (returns all sports).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds significant value by explaining the sportId parameter's purpose and example values (1=MLB, others). It clarifies the optional nature and return structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a sport catalogue for looking up sportId, with specific values like 1 for MLB. It distinguishes itself from sibling MLB tools which focus on specific data like teams or schedules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the purpose implies when to use (needing sport ID or list of sports), it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like specific league tools, nor does it mention when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.