entain_quicklinks_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only specifies the return format and gives an example. It does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, requires authentication, has rate limits, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, with purpose stated first, followed by return format and an example. No extraneous content, though it could be slightly more structured (e.g., clear sections).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and lack of output schema or annotations, the description should provide enough context to use it correctly. However, it omits critical information about the 'filter' parameter, making it incomplete. The return format is helpful but insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required parameter 'filter' with no explicit type ({}), and 0% schema description coverage. The description does not mention or explain the 'filter' parameter at all, leaving the agent completely unaware of how to construct a valid request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it returns navigation quick-links for racing/sports nav tiles, and provides an example 'Racing quick-links'. This clearly indicates the tool's purpose and resource type, though it lacks an explicit verb like 'list' or 'get'. It is distinct from sibling tools like entain_sport_event_card or entain_cms_entries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other navigation or listing tools. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or alternatives among the many sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.