mlb_schedule_tied

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description provides some transparency by showing the return structure: '{totalGames, dates:[{games:[...]}]}'. However, it does not disclose other behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication requirements, or whether the tool is read-only.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with only two lines—one for purpose and one for return format. It is front-loaded with the core use case. However, it could be structured to include parameter details in a compact way.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema and low parameter coverage, the description is incomplete. It explains the purpose and return shape but omits critical parameter semantics, making it insufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description fails to explain any of the three parameters (season, hydrate, gameTypes). It only mentions 'for a season' but does not clarify parameter formats or usage, leaving the agent with no guidance beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is for 'Tie-breaker / tied games for a season,' which distinguishes it from sibling tools like mlb_schedule and mlb_schedule_postseason. However, it could be more specific about what constitutes a tie-breaker game (e.g., regular-season games that determine playoff spots).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like mlb_schedule or mlb_schedule_postseason. The description does not mention context, exclusions, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.