mlb_game_pace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes return structure ({sports, teams, leagues}) and gives example metrics (pitches per game, time of game). However, with no annotations, it lacks disclosure of side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits, which would be expected for a read tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise two-sentence description plus return type example. Front-loaded with main purpose. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite low complexity (3 params, no output schema), the description omits parameter details and lacks usage examples. Incomplete for an agent to understand all inputs and outputs without further inference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%. Description adds meaning for 'season' and hints at 'teamIds' via 'optionally by team', but does not explain 'sportId' or parameter formats/defaults beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it returns game-pace/tempo metrics for a season, with optional team filtering. Distinguishes from other MLB tools like mlb_attendance or mlb_boxscore.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description only states what it does, not when to choose it over sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.