brc_get_nominal_journal_batch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It states it returns information, but does not explicitly disclose read-only behavior, authentication needs, or rate limits. However, for a simple getter, it's adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence that front-loads the purpose. No wasted words, highly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so description should indicate what 'information' is returned. It does not. Also lacks guidance among numerous sibling tools. Incomplete for an agent to fully understand the return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so description does not need to add much. It mentions 'by id' but does not elaborate on companyName. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema already documents both parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns information about a single Nominal Journal Batch by id, distinguishing it from sibling tools like brc_create_nominal_journal_batch, brc_delete_nominal_journal_batch, brc_list_nominal_journal_batches, and brc_update_nominal_journal_batch.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have an id and need batch details, but does not explicitly mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives like brc_list_nominal_journal_batches for listing all batches.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.