Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
productive-mcp-rb2

productive-mcp-rb2

by rubenlangeweg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

list_boards

list_boards
Read-only

Retrieve boards from Productive.io, optionally filtered by project ID and limited to a specified count.

Instructions

Get a list of boards from Productive.io

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_boards"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idNoFilter boards by project ID
limitNoNumber of boards to return (max 200)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv2.0.0-alpha.7

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds no behavioral context like pagination or ordering, which is acceptable given annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loads the core purpose. No unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with two optional parameters and no output schema, the description could mention return structure or highlight the optional filter. Lacks completeness for full context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with both parameters documented. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a list of boards from Productive.io' clearly states the action (get list) and resource (boards), distinguishing it from siblings like create_board. However, it lacks specificity on filtering scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_projects or get_task. No context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools