Skip to main content
Glama
rubenlangeweg

productive-mcp-rb2

create_task

create_task

Creates a new task in Productive.io with title and project. Supports assigning to a user, setting due date, and selecting board or task list.

Instructions

Create a new task in Productive.io. If PRODUCTIVE_USER_ID is configured, you can use "me" to refer to the configured user when assigning.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesTask title (required)
descriptionNoTask description
project_idYesID of the project to add the task to (required by the API)
board_idNoID of the board to add the task to
task_list_idNoID of the task list to add the task to
assignee_idNoID of the person to assign the task to. If PRODUCTIVE_USER_ID is configured in environment, "me" refers to that user.
due_dateNoDue date in YYYY-MM-DD format
statusNoTask status (default: open)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, consistent with creation. The description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., side effects, return value, idempotency).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: the first states purpose, the second provides a useful parameter tip. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite full schema coverage, the description omits critical context: return format (e.g., task ID), environment variable setup for 'me', and error handling. Lacks completeness for a complex creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds value by explaining the 'me' alias for assignee_id, leveraging an environment variable. This goes beyond the schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new task in Productive.io' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_subtask or create_tasks_batch.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_subtask, create_tasks_batch) or prerequisites like project existence. The only hint is about the 'me' alias for assignee_id.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rubenlangeweg/productive-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server