productive-mcp-rb2
Related Servers
Alternatives to productive-mcp-rb2
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with a Productive.io workspace for managing projects, tasks, time entries, budgets, and invoices through natural language.33-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Productive.io task management platform, allowing users to retrieve tasks and filter by assignee, status, or project.26 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Harvest time tracking API for managing time entries, projects, and tasks through natural language.5-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables time tracking and project management through the Clockify API. Supports starting/stopping timers, logging time entries, managing projects and tasks, and generating reports with natural language commands.218 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to the TrackingTime API v4 for managing projects, tasks, and team assignments. Users can start or stop timers, log manual time entries, and organize project workflows using natural language.12 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables policy-aware access to the Productive.io API v2 for managing projects, tasks, time tracking, resource planning, financials, CRM, and reports, with safe defaults and staged writes for sensitive operations.12Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 83 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists between list_tasks and get_project_tasks, and add_to_backlog could be confused with create_task_list. Overall, the majority are clearly separated.
Tool names consistently use snake_case and follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_task, list_people, update_task_status). Exceptions like my_tasks and whoami are minor and still clear.
83 tools is excessive for a single MCP server, making it unwieldy. While the domain is broad, the number of tools could be reduced by consolidating or splitting into multiple servers.
The tool set covers CRUD for most entities (tasks, comments, pages, time entries) and includes reporting tools. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no deal update or invoice creation), but core workflows are well-covered.