createThankYouContactSlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions create/update behavior but does not describe side effects, permission needs, or what happens to existing slides. The detail about updating based on _index is already in the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the purpose. It is front-loaded with the key verb and object. While concise, it could expand slightly on the role of contacts without becoming overly long.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters, low schema coverage, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not clarify what constitutes a 'contact' (e.g., how name and email are displayed), the effect of multiple contacts, or the resulting slide layout.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 17%, yet the description adds no additional meaning to parameters. The parameters url, name, email, qrImageUrl, and message could benefit from context that is missing. The schema has a detailed description for _index, but others are bare.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates or updates a closing slide with a thank-you message and contacts. It uses specific verbs and identifies the resource type, but doesn't explicitly distinguish from sibling slide creation tools beyond the type of slide.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or scenarios where this should be preferred over other slide creation tools in the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.