createPyramidPrincipleSlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the tool can create or update slides but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether updates are destructive, permission requirements, or rate limits. The _index parameter's behavior is detailed in the schema but not in the description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no redundant information. The description is efficient but could benefit from a clearer structure front-loading the key operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and the description does not explain what the tool returns. Given 4 parameters and 2 required, the description should state the result of the operation. The context of sibling tools is not leveraged for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema, simply stating 'optional detailed breakdowns' which aligns with the 'details' parameter. No significant semantic enrichment.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb (create/update), resource (slide), and the specific principle (pyramid principle) with key message and supports. However, the sibling 'createKeyMessageWithSupportsSlide' likely overlaps, and no explicit differentiation is provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'createKeyMessageWithSupportsSlide'. The description does not state when not to use it or provide any usage prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.