createPorterFiveForcesSlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description notes 'create or update', indicating mutation, but no annotations are provided. It lacks details on behavior like slide replacement or error conditions, but does not contradict annotations (none exist).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded but could include a bit more context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a structured slide creation tool with no output schema and many sibling tools, the description does not explain the five forces parameters or how to use them. It lacks completeness for an agent unfamiliar with the framework.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (17%), and the description adds no parameter explanation beyond the schema's minimal descriptions. The five forces parameters are listed by name but their meaning is assumed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates or updates a Porter's Five Forces slide, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from many sibling tools that create other slide types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use Porter's Five Forces versus other frameworks or slide types. The description does not provide context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.