createCapabilityMaturitySlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states 'Create or update' but does not explain that update behavior depends on the _index parameter (e.g., append vs replace). The description omits key behavioral details such as whether updates are incremental or full replacement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Could benefit from slight restructuring to separate create vs update behavior, but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 2 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too brief. It does not explain what a capability maturity model is, how levels are interpreted, or how the _index parameter controls update vs append. Missing context for effective agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50% (only _index has description; capabilities lacks field-level descriptions). The phrase '(1–5)' adds meaning to the 'level' field within capabilities, which is otherwise undocumented. This partially compensates but does not fully clarify the array structure or required fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create or update a capability maturity model (1–5)' clearly specifies the verb (create/update) and resource (capability maturity model) with scale. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like createDigitalMaturitySlide, which may have overlapping functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among 80+ sibling tools, no explicit conditions, exclusions, or references to similar tools are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.