createBubbleChartPlaceholderSlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It merely states 'create or update' without detailing side effects, permissions, or what 'update' implies (e.g., overwriting existing content). The description adds minimal transparency beyond the inherent mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is too short to be helpful; it under-specifies the tool. While concise, it sacrifices necessary detail. The structure is flat and does not front-load critical information beyond the obvious.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and a large set of sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It lacks context on the intended use, parameter behaviors (especially for 'points'), and what the placeholder entails (e.g., empty chart vs pre-populated).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33% (only _index described). The tool description adds no meaning to parameters like 'points' or 'title'. It fails to explain what the bubble chart components (x, y, r, label) represent, leaving the agent to guess.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'create or update' and the resource 'bubble chart placeholder'. It is clear and specific to the tool's function. However, it does not explain what a 'placeholder' means in this context or distinguish it from sibling tools beyond the chart type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other slide-creation tools. The description lacks any contextual hints about prerequisites, typical use cases, or when to choose this specific placeholder type.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.