createSwotSlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool can both create and update, which is a useful behavioral trait. However, with no annotations present, it fails to mention any side effects, restrictions, or dependencies (e.g., does it require an active presentation? What happens to existing slides?).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it could include more informative details without becoming verbose. It adequately conveys the core action but at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the tool's purpose beyond the name, nor does it describe return values or how the tool integrates with other slides in a presentation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 20%, and the description does not clarify the meaning of the four required arrays (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats). It does not explain how these map to the SWOT matrix quadrants, leaving the agent to infer from the parameter names alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create or update a SWOT matrix,' identifying the specific resource (SWOT matrix) and action (create/update). However, it does not differentiate this from sibling tools like createBcgMatrixSlide or createTwoByTwoMatrixSlide, which also create matrix slides.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as an existing presentation, or when not to use it (e.g., when a different matrix format is needed).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.