Visualize compliance risk levels across areas by generating a heatmap slide. Create or update a placeholder slide to display risk assessments in presentations.
Create or update a compliance heatmap placeholder.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| areas | Yes | ||
| _index | No | If 0 <= _index < slides.length, update that position. Omit or -1/out-of-range to append to the end (default -1). | |
| levels | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states 'Create or update' implying mutation, but lacks details on side effects, overwrite behavior, permissions, or what happens to existing slides. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits essential information. It is front-loaded but sacrifices completeness for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide sufficient context. The agent cannot determine what a compliance heatmap placeholder entails, what areas or levels represent, or the tool's overall workflow.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 33% description coverage (only _index described). The description does not explain the meaning of 'areas' or 'levels', which are critical. The agent must guess their purpose, reducing the tool's usability.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies the verb 'Create or update' and the resource 'compliance heatmap placeholder', which gives clear purpose. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from the sibling tool 'createHeatmapPlaceholderSlide', which likely serves a similar generic function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many sibling slide creation tools. The description offers no context for selection or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/receptron/mulmocast-vision'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server