createSensitivityAnalysisSlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. The description states 'Create or update' but does not clarify whether updates overwrite existing content, require specific permissions, or have any side effects. There is no mention of rate limits, destructive actions, or authorization needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of six words, which is concise and front-loaded. However, it sacrifices informativeness for brevity; it could add a few more words to explain key aspects without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three parameters, no output schema, and only 33% schema description coverage, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what a 'sensitivity analysis placeholder' is, how the parameters are used together, or what the tool returns. The agent lacks information to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is only 33% (only '_index' has a description). The tool description does not clarify the meaning of 'variables' and 'scenarios' parameters beyond the schema's type constraints. The agent may not know that 'variables' refer to input variable names and 'scenarios' to scenario labels, which is critical for correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create or update a sensitivity analysis placeholder.' This identifies the verb (create/update) and resource (sensitivity analysis placeholder), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'createSwotSlide' or 'createPorterFiveForcesSlide'. However, the term 'placeholder' is ambiguous, potentially implying it is not a full-fledged slide.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not include any context about prerequisites, limitations, or scenarios where another tool might be more appropriate. The agent must infer usage solely from the tool name and parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.