createExecutiveSummarySlide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes create/update behavior and mentions the _index parameter for positioning. No annotations provided, so description carries the full burden; however, it does not disclose side effects (e.g., overwriting existing slides), permissions, or error handling. Adequate but could be improved.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose. Every word adds value; no fluff or redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the basic operation (create/update, parameter constraints) and the purpose. Missing details on return values or error states, but for a simple slide creation tool, it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters. The description only adds a qualitative suggestion ('clear title and 3-7 concise bullet points') which is already captured by minItems/maxItems. No additional semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool creates or updates an executive summary slide, specifying structure (title and 3-7 bullet points). The name and description distinguish it from numerous sibling slide tools (e.g., createAgendaSlide, createSwotSlide).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description implies it's for summaries, but lacks when-not or context about other slide types. Adequate but minimal.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.