Skip to main content
Glama
montrellcruse

ServiceTitan MCP

marketing_calls_voice_mail_get

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve voicemail audio for a Marketing Calls v2 call ID. Get the recorded message when you have the call ID from marketing_calls_get.

Instructions

Request the voicemail audio for a known Marketing Calls v2 call ID. ServiceTitan documents an audio/mpeg stream, but this wrapper delivers client-decoded data through its standard JSON/text envelope; use a binary-capable API client when faithful audio bytes are required. Use marketing_calls_get for the call record itself.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesCall ID

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv3.0.0
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {},
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observedv2.5.1

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, covering safety. The description adds valuable behavioral context by disclosing that while ServiceTitan documents an audio/mpeg stream, this wrapper returns client-decoded data via a JSON/text envelope, and that a binary-capable client is needed for raw bytes. This goes beyond the annotations and helps set expectations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no filler. It front-loads the main purpose, then provides the caveat about output format and the alternative tool. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with one parameter and an output schema (though not shown), the description covers the essential usage details: what it does, the version context, the output envelope caveat, and the alternative tool. No critical information is missing for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the single parameter with a description ('Call ID'), so baseline is 3. The description enhances this by specifying that the ID is a 'Marketing Calls v2 call ID', clarifying the exact version context. This adds meaning beyond the schema's simple description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Request the voicemail audio') and the resource ('a known Marketing Calls v2 call ID'), and it explicitly differentiates itself from marketing_calls_get by stating that tool retrieves the call record itself. This makes the tool's purpose unambiguous and distinguishes it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear alternative ('Use marketing_calls_get for the call record itself') and also advises on client requirements for binary fidelity. It does not explicitly state when not to use this tool, but the alternative and the caveat about binary bytes offer practical usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools