AgentBots: Get an agent bot details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value beyond them: the required auth scheme and header name ('api-access-token'), plus a locale caveat about Persian/Arabic-Indic digits being passed unchanged. It still does not describe what the response contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is compact and front-loads the purpose before the endpoint, auth and encoding notes. The endpoint and auth lines are boilerplate but plausibly useful; nothing is redundant or padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read with full schema coverage and complete annotations, the description supplies purpose, endpoint, auth and encoding caveats. The one gap is that no output schema exists and the description does not hint at what fields are returned, but the remaining essentials are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single 'id' parameter, which sets a baseline of 3. The description goes slightly further by noting that IDs may be written with Persian or Arabic-Indic digits, which is directly relevant to how the id value is supplied.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Get the details of an agent bot') and pins the exact endpoint (GET /platform/api/v1/agent_bots/{id}), which implicitly distinguishes it from the sibling gapify_get_agent_bot in a different API surface. However, it never explicitly differentiates itself from the near-identical sibling, leaving the agent to infer the distinction from the path.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as gapify_get_agent_bot or gapify_platform_list_agent_bots. The auth note ('Platform app API key') implies a context but does not state the selection condition, so the agent gets no explicit routing help.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.