get_current_agent
Retrieve details of the currently authenticated agent in the customer support desk.
Instructions
Get Current Agent GET /api/v1/agents/me Tags: Agents
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve details of the currently authenticated agent in the customer support desk.
Get Current Agent GET /api/v1/agents/me Tags: Agents
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it requires authentication, what data is returned, or side effects. Essentially opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but at the cost of informativeness. It provides only the name, endpoint, and tags, which is too minimal to be helpful. Lacks key context that an agent would need to correctly invoke the tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should compensate with context. It does not explain what 'current agent' means, how to interpret the response, or prerequisites. Incomplete for a tool with zero structured guidance.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100% trivially. Description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, but baseline is 3 as the schema already covers all parameter aspects.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get Current Agent', which conveys the verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_agent' (requires ID) and 'get_agents' (list all), but does not explicitly explain 'current' meaning the authenticated agent. Slight ambiguity but sufficient.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings. The description does not mention when to prefer this over get_agent or get_agents, nor does it provide context for typical usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/metanmai/libredesk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server