update_file_category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description simply repeats the action 'update' without disclosing behavioral traits such as permission requirements, side effects, or what happens on success/failure. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden and fails to provide meaningful transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single minimal sentence, but it is under-specified rather than appropriately concise. It omits essential information an agent needs, so brevity here is a deficiency rather than an asset.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the nested category_data object and no annotations, this description provides almost no contextual information. Even though an output schema exists, the description fails to explain what the update does, what data is expected, or how it relates to file categories within this system.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no explanation of category_id or category_data. The category_data object is flexible (additionalProperties: true) but completely unexplained, leaving the agent guessing about its structure and required fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Update' and resource 'file category', making the core action clear. However, it provides no specifics on what can be updated and only minimally distinguishes from sibling tools like create_file_category or list_file_categories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance is provided. The description does not mention alternatives, prerequisites, or any context for when updating a file category is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.