update_association

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool updates and returns updated details, but does not disclose side effects, required permissions, partial vs. full update behavior, error handling, or what happens if the association does not exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with a clear docstring format using Args and Returns. Every sentence contributes information, and the main purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence without unnecessary filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an update tool with no annotations and a flexible association_data object, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what fields can be updated, how to structure nested data, or any behavioral constraints. While an output schema is indicated, the description still lacks essential usage and field semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters, but it only paraphrases the parameter names. 'association_data: Association data dictionary with fields to update' adds minimal clarity but does not specify valid field names, value types, or structure, making it insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update an existing association' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from create, get, and list siblings. The word 'existing' further clarifies that it modifies an already-created association.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_association or create_association. There is no mention of prerequisites, when an update is appropriate, or when another tool should be used instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.