List Update Sets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden, but it only states the core listing action and filtering options. It does not explicitly confirm read-only behavior or disclose any side effects, permissions, or pagination details beyond the schema. The verb 'list' implies safety, but extra context would help.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It efficiently conveys the essential purpose in 9 words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a straightforward list operation with no required parameters and a full output schema, the description covers the essential purpose and filtering capabilities. It doesn't add extra details, but none are critically needed for this low-complexity tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage for all 3 parameters, so the description adds little semantic value beyond restating that state and query filtering exist. It doesn't mention limit or provide syntax details beyond what the schema already documents; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the action 'List' and the resource 'update sets', and notes optional state and query filtering, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_update_set or list_update_set_changes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the description clearly implies this is the tool for listing update sets, it provides no explicit when-to-use versus alternatives (e.g., no mention of using get_update_set for a single set or list_records for other tables). The usage is understandable from context but not explicitly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.