tomticket_remove_custom_field_option

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes a meaningful warning, 'ATENCAO: altera producao' (attention: changes production), which is useful behavioral context beyond the raw operation. However, with no annotations provided, it does not disclose cascading effects, reversibility, permissions, or what happens to existing data using the option.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences, and the production warning is front-loaded. Every word earns its place; no filler or redundancy exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and zero parameter descriptions, the description is too thin to be fully actionable. It identifies the action but does not clarify how the parameters work together, which field identifies the option, or what the result of the operation is.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the three parameters. The operation name implies that custom_field_id and option_id are relevant, but the purpose of 'value' and the required/optional relationships are left entirely to inference.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Remove opcao de campo personalizado' (remove custom field option). It identifies the specific resource and operation, and is distinct from the sibling add_custom_field_option, though it does not explicitly name any alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as tomticket_add_custom_field_option or the listing tools. The production-change warning implies caution but does not state conditions, prerequisites, or exclusion cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.