Skip to main content
Glama
glira

mcp-tomticket

by glira

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-tomticket

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connect to SparrowDesk using MCP and manage your tickets, knowledge base and more.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server to interact with Zammad ticketing system, enabling ticket search, creation, update, article addition, and user/organization/group queries via the Zammad API.
      15 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables to interact with Re:lation support tickets via MCP. Allows searching, updating, replying to tickets, and managing customers and internal records.
      11
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Ticksy support ticket API, enabling AI agents to read and write support tickets.
      16
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes the i-net HelpDesk Ticket Web-API as tools for AI agents, enabling ticket search, reading, creation, and actions like replying, closing, and escalating, with attachment support.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct, but several families overlap: tomticket_list_departments already includes categories, operators, and statuses, while separate department-list tools exist. Similarly, tomticket_list_custom_fields overlaps with five scoped custom-field listers. The descriptions help, but the boundaries are not always obvious in a 49-tool set.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tools overwhelmingly follow a clear tomticket_verb_noun snake_case pattern, such as list_tickets, create_customer, and finish_ticket. Minor deviations like tomticket_customer_exists and tomticket_customer_quick_access break the verb-first convention, but the overall naming scheme remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    49 tools is well above the 25+ threshold and creates unnecessary navigation burden. Many tools could be consolidated with parameters, such as the six custom-field listers and four department listers, making the surface heavier than the domain requires.

    Completeness3/5

    Core ticket, customer, and article workflows are well covered, including mutation operations. However, notable gaps exist: there is no general ticket update/delete, no delete for articles/customers/organizations, no article-category management beyond listing, and chat tools are read-only with no reply capability.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues