get_details_of_a_single_custom_attribute

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states 'Get' but does not confirm read-only nature, auth requirements, or any side effects. The schema description incorrectly says 'to be updated', contradicting the tool's name, but the tool description itself adds no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence), but it is front-loaded with the purpose. However, it lacks substance; it does not add value beyond the tool name. Conciseness is acceptable but not optimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple schema, the description still fails to explain what 'details' are returned or any special behavior. No output schema, so description should clarify but does not. The tool is incomplete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (1 parameter, id, with description). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. The schema description includes a misleading 'to be updated' phrase, but the tool description does not correct or enhance it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get a custom attribute details', which is a clear verb+resource pair. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_account_custom_attribute' (also in the list), leading to potential confusion. The purpose is understood but not uniquely specified.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_account_custom_attribute, list_all_custom_attributes). No context, prerequisites, or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.