delete_agent_in_inbox

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the deletion is reversible, permission requirements, or side effects (e.g., what happens to conversations assigned to the removed agent). The description solely restates the action without adding transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it essentially repeats the tool name in slightly different words ('Remove' instead of 'delete'). It is efficient but adds minimal value beyond the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and the tool's destructive nature (deleting agents from an inbox), the description should ideally mention return values (e.g., success confirmation) or conditions (e.g., agent must exist in inbox). The current description leaves significant gaps for an AI agent to safely invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for both parameters (inbox_id and user_ids), achieving 100% coverage. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline but does not enhance understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remove an Agent from Inbox' clearly identifies the action (remove) and resource (agent from inbox), and the tool name itself distinguishes it from siblings like 'delete_agent_from_account'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from 'update_agents_in_inbox' or 'add_new_agent_to_inbox', leaving room for ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'delete_agent_from_account' or 'delete_agent_in_team'. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., agent must be assigned to inbox) or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.