delete_agent_from_account
Remove an agent from your DMTicket account by providing the agent's ID.
Instructions
Remove an Agent from Account
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the agent to be deleted. |
Remove an agent from your DMTicket account by providing the agent's ID.
Remove an Agent from Account
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the agent to be deleted. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description omits behavioral details such as whether the agent is permanently removed, any cascading effects, required permissions, or side effects. With no annotations, this is a significant gap for a delete operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks important information. It is not overly verbose, but could be restructured to include more context without sacrificing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain the impact of deletion, return behavior, or error states, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description (id: 'The ID of the agent to be deleted.') is clear. The tool description does not add further meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Remove' and the resource 'an Agent from Account'. It is specific enough to understand the tool's function, but does not differentiate from similar sibling tools like 'delete_an_account_agent_bot' or 'delete_agent_in_inbox'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The description is purely declarative without any usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/doanhnd9989/dmticket-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server