subscribePriceLimit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully convey behavioral traits. It fails to disclose any: no information on whether subscriptions are persistent, how multiple subscriptions are handled, rate limits, or what happens after a message is received. The behavioral model is completely opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short phrase, which is concise but under-specified. It sacrifices necessary detail for brevity. Proper conciseness would still include key behavioral and param info. This is more omission than efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of many sibling subscription tools, 4 parameters with no schema descriptions, and no annotations, the description is critically incomplete. An AI agent cannot determine the tool's exact function, proper invocation, or expected behavior without additional information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the input schema provides no parameter descriptions. The tool description does not compensate; it does not explain what 'symbol', 'category', 'messageCount', or 'timeoutMs' mean. The only hint is that 'category' defaults to 'linear', but the purpose of these parameters remains unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '订阅价格限制推送' (Subscribe to price limit push) indicates the verb (subscribe) and resource (price limit push), but it is vague and does not distinguish this tool from many similar sibling subscription tools like subscribeTickers or subscribeOrderbook. The purpose is implied but lacks specificity about what constitutes a 'price limit push'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not explain when to use this tool versus alternatives such as subscribePriceAlert or other subscriptions. There is no mention of scenarios, prerequisites, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.