setBatchCollateralSwitch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic operation (batch enable/disable) but does not mention side effects, authorization requirements, rate limits, or error handling. Critical behavioral traits are missing for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks sufficient detail. It is front-loaded with the key action, but the brevity sacrifices informative content. It is not verbose, but it is under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool modifies state (collateral switches), has no output schema, and has a sibling for single updates, the description should include prerequisites, mutation implications, or error scenarios. It only states the basic operation, leaving completeness gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the description adds no explanation of the 'request' parameter. The description merely repeats the function name without clarifying the parameter structure (array of objects with coin and collateralSwitch). The agent gains no additional insight beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Batch enable or disable multiple coins as collateral' uses a specific verb (batch enable/disable) and clearly identifies the resource (coins as collateral). It distinguishes this tool from the sibling 'setCollateralSwitch' which handles single coins, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. Although the name implies batch operations, there is no guidance on context or exclusion, such as 'use this for multiple coins; for single coin, use setCollateralSwitch'. This leaves the agent without clear decision criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.