getCryptoLoanFixedRepaymentHistory

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The only behavioral detail provided is a rate limit of 5 requests per UID. With no annotations, the description fails to disclose pagination, ordering, or other important behavior such as default response format or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, with the rate limit front-loaded. However, it is so minimal that it sacrifices necessary information, making it less useful despite its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With four parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how to use parameters like cursor for pagination or what the output structure looks like, limiting an agent's ability to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

None of the four parameters (repayId, loanCurrency, limit, cursor) are explained in the description. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The tool name and description clearly indicate it queries loan repayment records. However, it does not differentiate between fixed and flexible loan types, missing a chance to distinguish from the sibling tool getCryptoLoanFlexibleRepaymentHistory.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like getCryptoLoanFlexibleRepaymentHistory or other loan history tools. No context on prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.