subscribeAdlAlert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety and extensibility profile is covered. The description adds the subscription/push nature and the ADL alert resource, but it does not disclose the stream lifecycle, message format, or how to stop the subscription.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded Chinese sentence with no filler words. It is efficient and to the point, though it sacrifices detail for brevity; there is no redundancy or wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This subscription tool has 3 parameters, no parameter descriptions, and no output schema. The description does not explain what the push returns, how timeoutMs affects the subscription, what messageCount controls, or how this relates to getAdlAlert. An agent would need significant outside knowledge to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not mention any parameter. coin is self-explanatory, and timeoutMs and messageCount are somewhat inferable from names/defaults, but messageCount's exact meaning (number of messages vs. count of aggregated alerts) is ambiguous, and no parameter descriptions exist to compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('订阅'/'subscribe') and resource ('ADL 预警推送'/'ADL alert push'), making its core function clear. It implicitly distinguishes from the sibling getAdlAlert by using 'subscribe' instead of 'get', but it does not explicitly differentiate from other subscribe* tools or explain what ADL refers to.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like getAdlAlert or other subscribe* tools. Selection would have to be inferred entirely from the name and the user's intent; no conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.