getOrderDetail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds no behavioral context such as what the detailed information includes, possible error conditions, or whether the order must be in a certain state. It only adds the domain scope 'P2P', which is more purpose than behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It conveys the essential operation and target resource efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-ID read-only lookup, the description covers the core invocation need: pass an orderId and get detailed information. Since there is no output schema, the description's mention of 'detailed information' serves as a basic return indication. It omits optional nuance like order status or response format, but those are not essential for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain what orderId means, where it comes from, or any constraints. The single required string is somewhat self-explanatory, but the description fails to compensate for the lack of schema-level documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('detailed information of a specific P2P order'). The singular framing clearly distinguishes it from list-oriented siblings like getOrderList, getAllOrders, and getOrderHistory.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you already have a specific P2P orderId and want its details, but it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use this tool. The context is clear but leaves the comparison to the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.